Suspension of Edo LG chairmen a nullity – PDP

Forum 3 days ago

Suspension of Edo LG chairmen a nullity – PDP

The Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, in Edo State has faulted the suspension of chairmen in the 18 local governments of the state by the House of Assembly.

In a statement by the state PDP Chairman, Anthony Aziegbemi on Tuesday in Benin, the party described the action as unconstitutional, null and void.

Aziegbemi explained that the suspension disregarded the recent ruling of the Chief Judge of Edo State, Justice Daniel Okungbowa.

According to him, the suspension was a blatant violation of the Supreme Court’s decision, which affirmed the autonomy and independence of local governments, as guaranteed under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“How can a governor direct the State Assembly to suspend democratically elected chairmen of the 18 local councils for insubordination when these officials enjoy autonomy and independence as enshrined in the Constitution,” he said.

It was recalled that the State House of Assembly suspended all the elected 18 Local government chairmen and Vice chairmen for alleged insubordination and gross misconduct.

The state PDP Chairman noted that local council chairmen were not subordinates of the governor, the State Assembly, or any other arm of government.

He expressed concern over the complete disregard for the Constitution and the judiciary’s rulings.

“We are also aware that the Chairmen and their vice chairmen were not given the opportunity to defend themselves.

"They were suspended unheard, based on watery, trumped-up charges,” Aziegbemi said.

He stressed that such actions were not only illegal but also a direct assault on democracy and the rule of law.

Aziegbemi said that the Speaker and the entire Edo House of Assembly had clearly exceeded their constitutional mandates by carrying out the illegal action.

He urged the Assembly to immediately reverse its decision in respect for the rule of law and the principles of democratic governance.

He emphasized that adherence to the Constitution was non-negotiable.

He also called on the Attorney General and Minister of Justice of the Federation to intervene, stating that the state government actions constituted a breach of the Constitution and a threat to security.